Real World · Belonging & Identity
Why We Cheer for Strangers
Sports can turn people who have never met into a powerful “we.” Social identity helps explain the emotion, meaning and rivalry.
A sports fan can say “we won” without having touched the ball, learned the playbook or met any of the players. That small pronoun tells us something important: fandom can incorporate a team into a person’s social identity.
Success can become part of the self
A classic 1976 set of studies by Robert Cialdini and colleagues introduced the phrase “basking in reflected glory.” After football victories, university students were more likely to display school-affiliated clothing, and the researchers also observed changes in the tendency to use “we” when describing successful outcomes. The idea was not that every fan behaves identically, but that people can connect their self-presentation to the success of a valued group.
That phenomenon is easy to recognize outside sports. Humans take reflected pride in schools, cities, professions, nations, families and movements. Sport provides an unusually visible laboratory because the symbols, contests, victories and opposing groups are so clearly marked.
Belonging can provide meaning
More recent research has examined the positive social side of fandom. A 2017 study in Group Dynamics found that sense of belonging helped explain relationships between sports fandom or team identification and meaning in life. Research with older adults has likewise linked game attendance and team identification with perceived emotional support and, through belonging, subjective well-being.
The important mechanism may not be the athletes themselves. A team creates recurring occasions for people to meet, talk, remember, anticipate and perform membership. A fan inherits stories from parents, recognizes strangers by symbols and gains a ready-made subject of conversation. The game supplies a schedule for social life.
Why rivalry comes so easily
Groups become clearer when there is another group nearby. Uniforms, songs, colors and geography mark who belongs. Rival teams provide an “out-group” against which the in-group becomes more vivid. Most of this remains playful and bounded by rules, but group psychology can also intensify hostility, dehumanization or aggression under certain conditions.
It would be too simple to say sports fandom is merely tribalism. Fans can admire opponents, hold multiple identities at once and use rivalry as theater rather than genuine hatred. The same person who shouts at an opposing supporter during a match may share a train with them afterward.
Why strangers can matter
Fans also form one-sided attachments to athletes, coaches and clubs whose members do not know them personally. But the social world around fandom is often very real and reciprocal: friends, family traditions, local gatherings and supporter communities. The stranger on the field becomes a focal point around which non-strangers build relationships.
The deeper question is therefore not why people foolishly care about an irrelevant game. It is why games are so good at creating identity. They offer repeated rituals, visible symbols, shared uncertainty, emotional synchrony and a clear “we”—all in a form that can be renewed next week.
What the evidence suggests
Sports teams can become part of social identity, and fandom can provide belonging, social support and meaning through the communities and rituals organized around the team.
What it does not establish
That sports fandom is uniformly beneficial, that all rivalry is harmless, or that fans literally confuse their own achievements with athletes’ achievements.
What remains difficult
When healthy group identification becomes exclusion or aggression, and how different fan cultures turn the same basic identity mechanisms toward very different outcomes.
Sources & further reading
- Cialdini et al. (1976), Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies.
- Wann, Hackathorn & Sherman (2017), sports fandom, belonging and meaning in life.
- Research on sport spectatorship, emotional support, belonging and subjective well-being among older adults.
- Mansfield and colleagues (2026), team identification, group norms and health orientation.
See something that should be corrected, qualified or updated? Contact Humanistan.